 | Main Links |  |
|
| Links | |
|
What is a Mexican?
Some people believe the desire to expel Mexicans is a racial issue. These are people who are misled as there is no such thing as a Mexican race any more than there is an American race. The nationa of Mexico has many races of people just like America does.
Just to make things clear, we have included the definition of Mexican as published on azteca.net
Mexican
Specifically, the nationality of the inhabitants of Mexico. Therefore, the term is used appropriately for Mexican citizens who visit or work in the United States, but it is insufficient to designate those people who are citizens of the United States (they were born in the US or are naturalized citizens of the US) who are of Mexican ancestry. The various terms used to properly designate such people are described below, however, it is important to explain why these people feel it is important to make such a distinction. US citizens who are troubled by this often point out that most immigrants do not distinguish themselves by point of origin first, (i.e., German-American), but simply as "Americans" (another troublesome term, but we won't get detoured by that here). Here are some reasons why many US citizens of Mexican extraction feel that it is important to make the distinction:
While the term Hispanic or Latino would refer to ones race, Mexican refers to ones nationality. I know, I would think that an elected representative would know the difference and not make himself look so ignorant in the public's eye. Unfortunately, intelligence is not a requirement to win an election. It only takes a good campaign manager to tell the candidate what to say and when to say it.
We address the open borders policy that many of you support. Please read Open Borders: In due time.
The fact is, while there are criminal immigrants from other countries invading the US, the vast majority come from Mexico. We are literally being invaded by Mexicans. It is past time we put a stop to it. So if you are a Mexican and you are here illegally, GO HOME!
We do not consider those who came from Mexico legally to live in the US to be Mexican, because as we stated previously, Mexican is ones nationality. Those who are here legally are Americans. Now do you get it?
Deport Criminal Immigrants™ |
 Posted May 15 2009, 18:35 By MRandolph |
|
|
I received the following email newsletter from Senator David Vitter's office today.
Dear Friend,
This week I introduced an amendment to the Credit Cardholders Bill of Rights Act that would require the identification of any individual who is a non-citizen or U.S. National wanting to receive a credit card to be verified by the financial institution before receiving an account.
In many cases financial institutions accept minimal documentation that can be easily falsified. This current loophole in federal law is an open invitation for banks to allow illegal immigrants to open credit card accounts. And by giving rewards normally given to American citizens to those who are residing in the United States illegally it’s a form of back-door amnesty.
In 2007, the Wall Street Journal reported that Bank of America began marketing and offering credit cards to customers without social security cards, mainly targeting Illegal Immigrants. I find it appalling in the midst of the turmoil in the credit market that some banks still give out credit accounts to those without proper citizenship documentation. That is why my amendment would have required banks to only accept the most secure forms of identification that cannot be easily forged or duplicated.
I’ve been pressing for these answers for months, since well before the president even nominated a new FEMA administrator. After months of non-response, I set up a conference call with the acting administrator on Feb. 26, during which she said she understood the urgent nature of the matter and expected a positive resolution very soon. But we waited more than 70 days with no answers.
I believe that the current regulations that do not verify a customer’s citizenship identification are a disservice to the American people. And I will continue to push for a change in these regulations to help stem the tide of illegal aliens that benefit from this flawed practice.
Sincerely,
David Vitter
U.S. Senator
|
|
|
 | |  |
Re: Today's letter from Senator David Vitter
15 May 2009 18:37 By MRandolph
This was my response to the above letter.
Dear Senator Vitter,
I am happy that you work so hard to protect Americans from criminal immigrants. I am a founding member of both online communities at
MexicansGoHome.com and aFreeCountry.com so it is not easy for me to disagree with the amendment that you recently introduced for the
"Cardholders Bill of Rights Act". Firstly, I find it outrageous that politicians so readily devalue the rights that we have in the united
States of American by claiming that we have rights to things that we do not and should not have. We do not have a right to government
favoritism in the conduct of private business. It is government's intrusion into private business that has driven so many jobs overseas. It
also makes it harder to defend those God given rights laid out in the US Constitution when people are lead to believe that "rights" are
given to us by our government and not by God.
I would however support legislation that would hold back government support to those businesses that do conduct business with criminal
immigrants. I, of course, never support tax payer funding to any private business for any reason. Bailouts are governments way of rewarding
lousy business practices. I did not receive a bailout for my failed business years back and I rightfully did not deserve it.
On the other hand, I commend the efforts that you have made to secure our southern borders to rid the US of criminal immigrants. I believe
that we should focus efforts to rid the US of criminal immigrants through legislation that would truly punish businesses and people for
harboring or transporting these criminals. We should also build and actual fence across our southern border that would make it more
difficult for these criminals to enter our country.
Several states have proven that legislation that makes it tough for those who harbor and transport criminal immigrants works as evidenced by
the exodus of criminal immigrants from those states. I fully support any legislation that would fine any business caught in the act of
hiring criminal immigrants no less than ten percent of the businesses last years earnings on the first infringement and increasing by ten
percent for each following infringement.
To summarize, I do not support you amendment to this act, but I do support your other efforts at securing our borders and ridding America
of criminal immigrants.
|
|
|
|
| User Block | |
| Statistics | |
We have 142 registered users
The newest I.C.E. member is robertlang
Our users have posted a total of 867 articles within 134 topics
|
|
|
Forum 
Did you hear that 
